《从灾难转变成吉宾——抖音卓宝的由小细相争衷直播传奇》

一、简介

在今天全球性的病气大起，人们不得不在线朋友联系。抖音是我们信息时代使用到的最佳工具。在挑战中，一个名叫抖音卓宝的YouTuber以独特而令人难忘的方式脱颗颗凉，渐显出他非凡的故事。

二、卓宝卓宝个人资料直播间

抖音卓宝以其“卓宝卓宝个人资料直播”一个直播间闻名，通过自己的生活奔放和大胆展现了他不同于平常的精神。他不仅将个人经历公开于网上，还利用直播来与观众分享日常生活、学习新技能以及创作音乐作品。抖音卓宝的直播间不只是一种沉浸式内容传递，更成为观众与他之间紧密的社交桥段。

三、从小细相争衷转变成吉宾

抖音卓宝起初，只是一个无奇志的青少年，在家中忙碌为乐。他自带电子设备进行微型视频播放，不料其简单直播片段侵入了全球观众的生活。然而，这个小小的冒犯成为了他未来的成功之路上一座桥梁。通过奋斗和不懈努力，他在多大的时间里攀走到名声举足轻重的顶峰。

四、影响力与传播

由小细相争衷直接而来，抖音卓宝的故事让人们深刻认识到在社交平台上如何使用自己成为引领者。他通过网络直播展现了自己真正的性格和价值观，从而建立起了广大的忠实观众群体。不仅在中国乃至全球各地有着互动量丰富多彩的观众，他也成为了音乐界、视频制作界和社交平台上的一个重要人物。

五、榜向性的未来展望

抖音卓宝现在已经是具有很大影响力的YouTuber，但他对自己未来的规划和梦想是如此广阔。他计划通过不断创新与自我宣道，成为更多的影响力者，并持续带领世界化的观众前进。抖音卓宝正是这个时代无可匹敵的典范，他的故事不断传递着关于如何在网络社会中创造自己命运、为更多人做出积极影响的启示。

总结：抖音卓宝从小细相争衷直播壮族转变成了吉宾，他的故事是一个穿越社交平台时代，展现勇于创新、自我实现的典范。他不仅通过直播娱乐消息传播，更在全球各地建立了一个影响力大的社区，并为观众们提� Written evidence submitted by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) 2021.

RSC response to consultation on the development and use of chemicals in agriculture (October 2021).

Executive Summary

The RSC acknowledges that agricultural production has a major impact on our world, including the environment and human health. However, we believe this can be managed effectively through improved science-based regulation rather than restrictions. In order to ensure that the potential benefits of chemicals are fully realised, while minimising any negative consequences for the environment and public health, there should be an emphasis on research, monitoring and innovation in all areas.

Background

Chemicals have been used in agriculture since ancient times with crop protection being fundamental to food production around the world. They play a key role in reducing pests and diseases (e.g., through the use of plant protection products including fungicides, herbicides and insecticides) that can impact on yields and quality; nutrient supply (including fertilisers and manures); soil functioning and water management.

Many chemicals have undergone extensive testing over many years to determine their efficacy and safety as well as optimising ways of use, including the development of lower risk products, such as those with improved target specificity or reduced environmental impacts through better application methods and technologies. In particular, integrated pest management (IPM) practices can help reduce reliance on chemical pesticides by using non-chemical control measures in combination with chemical approaches.

Chemistry plays an integral role in sustainability – for example, a number of advances have been made that support the efficient use of nutrients and water as well as reducing emissions (e.g., precision agriculture techniques). The RSC supports these developments but also recognises some potential negative consequences from the overuse or mis-application of chemicals in the environment, for example through runoff and soil contamination, which can lead to long term impacts on ecosystem health.

The RSC is concerned by both the increased use of harmful pesticides, as reported in several studies (e.g., see ,), but also an increasing trend towards organic farming. In this latter case there are concerns that a more narrow-range approach could lead to a greater reliance on manual labour and natural substances which may not be as effective as chemicals. For example, weaker pesticides can contribute to lower yields at higher population levels (), resulting in the need for additional land clearing or further intensification of agriculture.

We also recognise that there is a move towards alternative methods such as genetically modified crops (GM). Although GM techniques are not chemical-based, they often involve complex technologies and require significant investment from farmers and other stakeholders, so the potential environmental impacts must be carefully considered.

The RSC would therefore support a science-based approach to regulation of all agricultural chemicals which includes:

Research – supporting research into new ways in which we can improve efficiencies in food production whilst minimising negative impacts on health and environment, for example through the development of lower risk products or innovative technologies. Such support should include both fundamental science to understand basic interactions between chemicals/agricultural inputs with natural ecosystems, as well as applied research aimed at optimising best practices in real world conditions – taking into account existing data and emerging trends such as those identified through new monitoring methods (e.g., remote sensing technologies).

Monitoring and Regulation – continuously evaluating the safety of chemicals on both human health, animals and ecosystems as well as their environmental impact over time; updating regulatory frameworks in line with best practices including international standards where appropriate to ensure consistency across the EU. This should include consideration of residues (including cumulative effects) resulting from different combinations of agricultural inputs applied together or sequentially in an integrated system, and a move towards assessing whole farm management systems rather than individual chemicals. The use of innovative monitoring methods such as remote sensing technologies could provide early warning signals for the environment to indicate when certain areas should be treated differently.

Innovation – fostering continued innovation by promoting R&D activities in chemistry and related disciplines that can help improve agricultural practices, including new chemicals with lower environmental impact; development of tools to more effectively assess risk (e.g., novel analytical techniques for monitoring pesticides/chemicals); and advancing technologies such as precision farming techniques that allow for better control over the use and delivery of agri-chemical inputs, which could also lead to reduced application rates.

The RSC recognises there will always be a need for chemicals in agriculture – but believes this can be managed effectively through scientific research and innovation as part of an integrated approach that considers all relevant environmental, social and economic aspects; rather than by restricting the use of certain classes or types of product. We would therefore welcome initiatives to encourage continued R&D activities in these areas including support for farmer-led projects which can help identify appropriate solutions for specific situations (e.g., local conditions).

However, we believe that the chemical industry and regulators must be clear about their roles and responsibilities:

The role of manufacturers – providing information on product safety to relevant bodies responsible for approval or licensing as required; engaging with regulators throughout product development process where possible to help inform requirements and guidance; actively participating in data sharing initiatives, including through the use of standardised methodologies (e.g., for assessing residues) wherever possible; and working collaboratively on public education/communication activities around safety information associated with their products.

The role of regulators – ensuring a consistent approach across all EU member states and providing guidance to support industry in compliance as appropriate, including where national rules differ; developing policies that are science-based based on the latest evidence available whilst taking into account future developments; proactively encouraging research and innovation related to chemical use and regulation through collaborative initiatives with industry (e.g., co-funded projects); communicating key policy objectives clearly including for all relevant stakeholders, particularly farmers and the public at large.

We recognise that there is a need for ongoing improvement in these areas to ensure our regulatory frameworks remain fit for purpose and allow chemicals used responsibly (including where novel approaches are used) to play their part in sustainable food production and protecting health and ecosystems. However, we believe this can be achieved through improvements to the existing processes rather than new regulations. We would therefore urge that initiatives proposed in this consultation should only focus on strengthening those areas identified above.

Thank you for your consideration. If you require any further information or clarification please do not hesitate to contact me at rsc@rsoc.org.uk (contact details are provided below).

Dr Chris Rowen, Royal Society of Chemistry